Monday, May 20, 2013

Beer... Used to be Psychoactive.

“According to Linneaus, it was used by the people of Lima in Dalecarnia, instead of hops, when they brewed for weddings: '. . . so that the guests become crazy.' Linneaus called the plant galentara, 'causing madness', and this plant 'which the people of Lima sometimes use in their ale stirs up the blood and makes one lose one's balance.'. . . Yarrow is in no way innocent when mixed with ale. It has a strong odour and flavour, and well deserves the name Linnaeus gave it, to indicate the frenzy that was said to result from it...”

“One of the arguments of the Protestants against the Catholic clergy (and indeed of Catholicism) was Catholic self-indulgence: in food, drink, and lavish life style. And it was this Protestant outrage that was the genesis of the temperance movement. (It would not stop, of course, with the assault on gruit ales but would continue on to include ale itself and any kind of psychotropic or inebriating plants and drinks by the twentieth century.)...”

“The Protestant reformists were joined by merchants and competing royals desiring to break the brewing monopoly of the church. The result was, ultimately, the end of a many-thousand-year tradition of herbal beer making in Europe and the narrowing of beer and ale into one limited expression of beer production, that of hopped ales or what we today call beer. The majority of historical beer writers insist that this was only because (after some 10,000 years) our ancestors accidentally discovered that hops was antiseptic enough to preserve beer. Our ancestors were neither that blind nor narrow in their empiricism. Hops kept the beer from spoiling, yes, however a number of other herbs possess strong antibacterial properties and can help beer "keep." Many of those herbs were commonly used in ale, for instance wormwood and juniper. But hops possesses two characteristics notably different than the herbs it replaced - it causes the drinker to become drowsy and it diminishes sexual desire. Protestant literature of the time, denoting the "problems" associated with the gruit herbs, contradict contemporary beer historians and are in actuality some of the first drug control manifestos on record. The laws that eventually passed in the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries restricting the number of herbal additives used in brewing are actually the first drug control laws ever passed.”
- The Fall of Gruit and the Riseof the Brewer's Droop.

DAMN YOU, FOLLOWERS OF MARTIN LUTHER. Bring back the psychoactive booze, I say! American beer sucks, anyway. Except some microbrews, I guess.


Sunday, May 19, 2013

Fuck me. I'm an idiot.

So, after I was asked about why we put the sigil on the mirror, I thought of something. I can't believe I hadn't thought of it before, and leaving this caution out is very unwise of me:

I mention that you could use the rough method of treatment for thoughtforms and the mirror for standard conjurations. What I failed to mention is the most obvious thing, and makes me feel like an ass for forgetting to say... If you do a standard evocation with the mirror, take standard precautions. The spirit will be much more capable of obsessing you than a thoughtform ought to be. In fact, if you find yourself becoming convinced that you are Batman, or Superman, or generally obsessing [the character] following the ritual this is a sign that you need to take more time to focus on your basics: meditation, developing the will, making sound protections when you work. It should not be necessary, as you should have been doing all that long before considering a full scale working of even the most basic sort.

Finally, if you do a standard conjuration of a spirit from any magical book, it is [probably very] unwise to use both your reflection and the hypnotic state to see the spirit, and placing the seal of that spirit on the mirror. That is a probable recipe for obsession for the unprepared. It is even very unwise for scrying up visions of Gods. You don't want to get obsessed with Pan. Trust me on this.

If what I'm talking about doesn't make sense? I suggest doing more reading on the subject before considering doing anything with the mirror and spirits.

That said? The sigil can be used, never being superimposed over your face, and preferably above the area of your reflection, to designate areas you wish to see. (Note: I have never had much luck with scrying physical locations. If you end up being good at it, tell me what the hell I'm doing wrong. I'd love to know. Astral locations have worked much better, for me, overall.) As per usual, your mileage may vary.

Be careful, even if it is a beginner's ritual.

I have mentioned and recommended Volantia prior to mirror work. I would double this and add that you should seriously consider using Paschal's other techniques, too. They are meant to go along with the work, and they do suffice to help.

Also: Rachel is right. For those wishing a beginner's technique not involving Chaos-y things, a basic ancestor altar will be an excellent place to begin. But, I think she should make that post if she hasn't already.

Jack.

PS. Actually, now that I think about it? Don't ever, ever use that ritual style at all for a standard evocation. You want all your crap on hand for that: wand, pentacle, seal, etc. I would edit out my asshole swaggery, but I'll let it stand to show what I fool I am. I have edited in an alteration for any future readers. Jesus, I'm very sorry. What the fuck is my problem, man?

The Multiple Visages of Spirits

When Jason brought up intelligences attracted to a working and assuming shapes, and traditional evocation, I thought of something that I keep coming back to.

Years ago, and earlier today (thank you, my friend), R.O. was discussing evocation with me and presented me with a fragment of Agrippa's Third Book of Occult Philosophy (chapter 27) which has remained in my mind ever since:
But here it is objected by many, that it falls out, that in these tables men of a differing nature, and Fortune, do oftentimes by reason of the sameness of name obtain the same Genius of the same name. We must know therefore that it must not be thought absurd that the same Demon may he separated from any one soul, and the same be set over more. Besides, as divers men have many times the same name, so also spirits of divers offices and natures may be noted or marked by one name, by one and the same seal, or Character, yet in a divers respect: for as the serpent doth sometimes typifie Christ, and sometimes the devill; so the same names, and the same seals may be applied sometimes to the order of a good Demon, sometimes of a bad. Lastly, the very ardent intension [intention] of the invocator, by which our intellect is joyned to the separated intelligencies, causeth that we have sometimes one spirit, sometimes another, although called upon under the same name, made obsequious to us.*

Later, in the 32nd chapter of the same book he notes a chance encounter of Apollonius that has an equally interesting aspect to it: “when Apollonius and his companions were travelling in a bright Moon-shining night, that the Phantasme of a Hagge met them, and some times changed it self into this shape, & some times into that, and some times vanished out of their sight.”

I see these as twin issues with the discussion of evocation: first, that the same sign or seal may be used to call upon multiple spirits, and second that the spirits themselves can and will change shape. (Which is, obviously, why most evocations involve requesting that the spirit a “Fair and Pleasing Form,” rather than one which will make you shit bricks while they also 'counter-fumigate' the area with the stench of sulfur...) The shape-shifting or multiple visages also extends to work with deities, which I'll get into in a bit.

In determining the planetary significance and virtue or dignity of the spirit conjured, the psuedonomous Fourth Book (chapter five) also includes aspects to watch out for which reveal the nature of the spirit as it appears, such as for Saturn:
  • An Old man with a beard.
  • An Old woman leaning on a staffe.
  • A Hog. 
  • A Dragon.
  • An Owl.
  • A black Garment.
  • A Hooke or Sickle.
  • A Juniper-tree. 

Earlier in the chapter the author notes some major factors that can signify what one has on their hands: 
We may also attain to the knowledge of the dignities of the evil Spirits, by the same Tables of Characters and Images: for upon what spirit soever there falleth any excellent signe ir instrument out of the Table of Characters, he possesseth that dignity; if a Crest or Plume, a Dukedome; if a Horn, a County; if without these there be a Scepter, Sword, or forked Instrument, it sheweth Rule and Authority. Likewise out of the Table of Images you shall finde them which bear the chief Kingly dignity: from the Crown judge dignity; and from the Instruments, Rule and Authority. Lastly, they which bear an humane shape and figure, have greater dignity then those which appear under the Forms and Images of Beasts; they also who ride, do excel them which appear on foot. And thus according to all their commixtures, you may judge the dignity and excellency of Spirits, one before another. Moreover, you must understand, that the Spirits of the inferiour order, of what dignity soever they be, are alwaies subject to the Spirits of the superiour order: so also, that it is not incongruent for their Kings and Dukes to be Subject and Minister to the presidents of the superiour order.”

It would add some implements not mentioned in either books, but which can distinguish Cthonic spirits: the torch, for instance, can be encountered being wielded by a number of the Greek Cthonic Gods (Hekate comes to mind immediately). Almost any spirit I have met bearing her authority has either had a torch, or a satchel of plants displayed upon their form.**

Generally, I've found that a lot of information can be gleaned prior to further work from the presentation of the spirit. For whatever reason, spirits bearing significant authority tend to seem enjoy presenting these aspects of themselves to the evocator; a means of saying, I think, “this is what I am, and I wish to be treated according to the manner of my presentation.” Spirits who are enormously pissed, for example, by the evocation tend to take on “fearsome visages,” on the other end of the spectrum. They wish their anger to be known, and part of that communication can be with words (such as if they shout at you, which is distinctly unpleasant), or the form itself will be “aggressive.” It can be easy to confuse what I mean by this with imagining a more animal countenance, such as spirits with what Agrippa might call a “lesser dignity” (they are more attuned to animal nature). The difference in this case is between the face of a lion as it roars, versus when it is sitting placidly and simply relaxing after a hard hunt. Lunar and sublunar spirits may also play with one's perceptions of shadows; malevolent ones seeming to give off a different, more infernal vibe to the shadow than one might otherwise encounter. I know of only two ways of fixing the problem of an angered spirit: emploring a higher spirit, such as the Headless God, and requesting that they aid in solving the problem... And using terrifying and horrifying Holy Names, which may vary depending on the situation. If I am at the crossroads, I am obviously calling upon on Hekate... Whereas with an evocation in a more private setting, following along the lines of the Grimoires, I will resort to the exorcisms and exortations/abjurations that I am aware of. I have found, over time, that angered lunar and sublunar spirits can be kept from being overly aggressive by calling upon Hekate as “Brimo.”*** I strongly suspect this is because Hekate as Brimo is far more terrifying than the spirit itself. Which is rather amusing, since I once expected it to bolster offended spirits. You live and learn, I guess.

The capacity of spirits to shapeshifted is much compounded, too, when we talk about calling upon Gods through the various means that magicians and Pagans have on hand. Deities are perceived by each participant radically differently, and that perception can also change over time. When I first encountered Hermes, he very much seemed to me to have the 'Thoth' head that we see in Graeco-Egyptian syncretic art. I was, however, holding a piece of the Great Pyramid in my hands at the time and I strongly suspect this bolstered the hybrid and fluid form that I met. None the less, it was very much the 'same' Hermes that I still encounter. Since then, my perception of him has become more like a speedy human youth, unless I'm also riding the astral planetary waves of
Mercury... In which case I might not perceive anything at all remotely human, but something more akin to living patterns that are speaking and singing and dancing all at once. My perception of Hermes through the planet of Mercury is far less vital in the human sense, and far more about the components of mobility and agency.

Years ago, Mr. VI suggested that whenever I get an image of a God, I internally say: “No, you are not that.” He noted that the image would then change, which is something I've discovered to be true in my own work. You can then see a sequences of images which represent the deity, but are not the deity. This ends at a certain point at which a very specific, and charged, symbol comes into play to represent what is being dealt with. For Dionysos, for example, this has always been the Mask for me. The mask which speaks is the last and final image of the deity – which is not that, but can be represented by that – which comes into my mind.

I strongly suspect something akin to this may also be in play with spirits during the evocation process. This is probably because we don't “see” spirits with our eyes, but with our minds... And the visuals which we process are simply the only way our mind can deal with being presented with something that we can't entirely comprehend, but we can catch – at best – glimpses of. Shining moments of brilliance that shatter conceptions, at times, and fill the mind with the raw glory of that which has come upon the practitioner. Fuck, suddenly I wish I was a poet so that I could write poems about the forms and beauty and sound...

Anyway.

There is one last thing that keeps coming back into my mind, about the multiple spirits and evocation which is not quite on topic but dovetails with it nicely. When we talk about the spirits of the
Psuedomonarchia, they are presented in a very medieval and feudal fashion for very obvious reasons. And almost all of them are given a specific allotment of “legions of spirits” which serve them. Is it possible, I wonder, that occasionally when one feels the same evocation has raised different spirits, that one has encountered one of the members of those legions, bearing the authority of the ruling spirit? While this has nothing to do with classical evocation: during my first attempt to better know and understand Hekate, I met a spirit bearing the image of a Priestess that was clearly a root digger, who indicated she was not Hekate but bore the authority of the Goddess. When I requested that she indicate the signs of that authority to me, she did so quite willing (the torch and satchel amongst them), and then proceeded to provide me with an oracle regarding what would come to pass before I should attempt to return to the astral form of Esquiline Hill that I had visited. These events, as odd as they seemed to me at the time, did come to pass. Although I do not visit the Hill nearly enough, these days...

[EDIT]:  I realize that when Agrippa is speaking, he's distinguishing between occasions when a good spirit or an 'infernal' spirit both have the same names and seals and can be called on, and that in no way implies they send their lessers around. However, that odd experience with the servant of Hekate makes me wonder if it happens more often than people realize. Just to clarify.

Feel free to shut down what anyone feels is undo conjecture, but I figured some of these thoughts were worth putting out there.

Be seeing you,
Jack.


* Italix mine. I have also supplied the entire paragraph, since it is enlightening to read in the whole.
** I could also just be crazy. Buyer beware.
*** Other deities can also be called upon by that title, particularly Persephone and Demeter.
 

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Addendum to the Screed

Let me be clear about yesterday's post: it isn't about how superheroes can be evoked, so they're just like “heroes.” It was about how, actually, it can be done, and if you think that's a threat...? You probably need to review your priorities regarding what threatens your spiritual practice and what does not. I decided to post a noobsauce technique specifically for experiment by noobs, or by old hands who had somehow missed the bus on having fun as a noob.

There's nothing wrong with having missed that bus.

As for what, specifically, it is that you've called into the mirror?

Jason Miller asks:
Question: What do you think the role, if any, of disembodied intelligence getting attracted and pulled into the evocation is? These beings perhaps taking the role of what you are evoking?

I often think this what is happening during some traditional evocations as well.”

I think that's highly probably. It's quite possible that if you filter in the most silly possible construct through an appropriate planetary philter, the intelligences of that realm will conform to your expectations and simply show up looking like Batman, Spock, or Superman.

It is also possible that there are places on the astral where iterations of fictional characters live out dreamlives, and that this what successful authors tap into whenever they write a “good story” regarding those characters.

It's also possible that the act of evoking something “not real” is like building your own thoughtform, and bringing it into the world.

There is another possibility which comes even more to mind: that the sigil you've created forces some poor, hapless lesser spirit to think it is Batman, or Superman, briefly and responding 'as if' it were.

All of these are possible, but it's best of we leave it up to individuals to decide what they think has happened. I tend to default more to the idea that the astral is infinite space, and includes “worlds” we consider fictional. Part of the reason you want to break everything down into a pragmatic map, in this case, is to avoid talking to Bruce Wayne when you're actually trying to call up the Angel named Tzadkiel. Or whatever. But that doesn't mean I'm right. It just an idea I've played with from time to time.

The largest, most productive benefit that can be gleaned from thoughtforms and working with them as such is that you will notice the obvious differences between what you've conjured versus other spirits. They are less useful. They have less to say. Batman will not be able to help you find a job, no matter how much you may implore him to do so. But unlike Heracles, he also might not punch you in the face for living a life totally devoid of Arete and still having the gall to try and call him up. (Don't get me wrong; it could be that Heracles will just explain how to live a life dedicated to Arete.)

If after a term of working with possibly non-real things and then turning around and using those skills to do more serious things, you still can't see the difference? I am of the opinion – and it is my opinion only – that you are “doing it wrong.” You may rely on a psychological basis for magick and give no fucks as you discuss how magick is all Narrative and spirits aren't real, anyway. We disagree, but there are people who definitely feel that way.

Neo-Pagans and Magicians alike tend to froth at the mouth about “unverified personal gnosis” – things gleaned from magickal and mystical workings and then trotted out as “truth” by practitioners. With circles of magicians, you have a long history of going through a lot of trouble conjuring and abjuring the spirit to be truthful (whether it be a lesser Daimon, or an extremely badass deity) and then testing what it says through elaborate means to discover if the right spirit has been encountered. Neo-Pagans (and some Recons, etc.) don't seem to have quite as many means of testing spirits to see if they are what they say that they are.

Working with thoughtforms is an effective gauge for learning the curve of what you've found. After you've encountered a spirit with almost no pull whatsoever and then another, fully empowered spirit, the differences in quality and the experience are two totally different things altogether. But you can't explain this to someone who is lacks knowledge of the difference in experience altogether. They're using techniques available to beginners for what are essentially beginner's tricks. They will probably, as part of the learning curve, misapply what they've done a few times before they eventually encounter something that shatters their own beliefs about what they're doing and how well it is going. It's part of the learning process, you dig?

That doesn't make the beginner's tricks less useful, or not useful at all. They have their use and application in allowing the practitioner expand their horizons without the possibility of a giant fuckup. Telling the difference between the Eternal Essence of a Hero, who lives forever in the land of the Dead, and a random, lying member of the Restless Dead is far harder than telling the difference between your evocation of Batman and your Evocation of Heracles. It is far smarter tell the beginner to start out with Batman and then later consider chatting up Heracles. By the time they get around to chatting up Heracles, they will be able to see some difference between one and the other.

I do think there’s a horrible potential for error, though, when people begin to mistake these activities for spiritual practice, or to take the engagement of active and creative imagination in them for the same process which often goes into devotional or cultic activities. Both actively engage the imagination and creativity, as I’ve said repeatedly (and perhaps unhelpfully!) here; but, there is a difference, and it is the cultic factor mentioned above. I’ve cringed horribly when I meet younger pagans who think that paganism and the gods are role-playing games, and that they have “gifts” and “abilities” and “talents” and so forth with this or that, as if they themselves are characters in a role-playing game and that the gods are their “dungeon masters” who have allowed them to have those “gifts” and “abilities” and such. I had a long conversation with someone in Ireland once who played way too much World of Darkness/White Wolf tabletop and LARP, and thought that paganism worked the same way, and that the various gods have “levels” and “power” and so forth analogous to RPG stats from Deities and Demigods (or Legends and Lore, etc.). It saddens me that even at PantheaCon, there have been multiple years in which a workshop is offered for teenage pagans on “Dungeons & Dragons as an Introduction to Paganism.”...”

I encounter this whole problem a lot. It doesn't bother me, much. Not half as much as those that style themselves as Priests, etc, and then spend their time telling youngsters how to practice. Often, I feel, the practices that the serious recommend to the youngsters are stupid. I'm not accusing Phil of this, but I've seen people tell individuals that want to experience astral projection and the boons that come with it that they should read the Sepher Yetzirah or something. They only way to slog through such a work is to be passionate about it, and telling someone who hasn't indicated that passion to do it is a pointless waste of time. How about recommend learning to astral project so they can just get the fire-ball throwing and having chats with dragons bits out of the way? If that is what they want, then astral magick is where it is at. No, it isn't gaining enlightenment. And no, they aren't going to be as “powerful” as they think they are. But hopefully that factor will dawn on them over time when it becomes obvious that they are using a skillset for fun which can also be used to better their own life. And when they set out to do that? That is when they will come into their own.

I have met so many older pagans, polytheists, and witches and magicians that are threatened by pop-culture treatments of magick that they rant about how people just want to learn “the flash” of magick or come to them wanting what they learn to be like characters Charmed or Supernatural or something. Instead of exploring areas with those youngsters that can build up a skillset they can take out and use readily and easily later, they are instead told they are delusional and that “it isn't for them.” This is one of the reasons that Chaos Magicians will always exist. We give precisely no fucks about setting up a hierarchal border of what must be done. What we care about is what you can do, what you can do with it, and how you end up using what you can do later. If you can conjure a hero into a mirror, you should be able to conjure a thoughtform. If you can't conjure a thoughtform? Something is wrong with how you are going about doing things.

There is always the risk of delusion. It is a normal part of “Divine Madness” – of making your brain trip ballz to the poing that you literally cannot tell what is real, and what is not. Part of that process is becoming delusional, and later coming to grips with that fact realistically. There will always be a subset o practitioners who meet Venusian Dolphin Masters whose art was lost in deepest Atlantis or something. It won't go away, because once you enter the right state of mind, once you open the floodgates, the assumptions you have about what is real and is not real are going to go right out the window. You may well have a good idea what constitutes metaphysical validity, and you might not. But you literally will not have any idea of how older ideas from the past, actual magickal practices, actually work out in reality versus in theory until you do it. And when you do it, you'll be spending a period time in Crazyville. Delusion is a natural byproduct of Crazyville. Getting over your petty delusions of grandeur is part of the process of learning to live side-by-side with Crazyville.

There are plenty of Folk Saints who were probably never actually people. Jesus Malverde was never an actual person, in all likelihood. That doesn't change the fact that Jesus Malverde still answers prayers from anyone willing to learn a bit about him, give him a prayer, and maybe some primo weed. Let me ask you, would you rather someone compare working with Batman to trying to work with a Hero, or compare working with Malverde? Because Folk Saints are far closer to the Heroes of the old European Cults – in treatment and approach – than superheroes. But that doesn't mean it will make you feel any better.

It is a big, strange world that we live in. Build up the skills to do the magick. That matters, to me at least, far more than debating about the dangers of delusion. Because crazy shit that should never work, quite often does work. Whether we like it, as practitioners or religious devotees, or not.

[EDIT]: VI, who writes every Wednesday on sorcery and storytelling, has a post of his own. As per usual, I encourage you to read his weekly Wednesday Wotan Storytelling/Sorcery posts, and this one.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Strange Pastures

Sod Off, indeed, Mr. Constantine.
[Warning: At  points, my tone drips with vitriol. Largely, this has been inspired by variations of this silly debate over time.]

I am a Chaos Magician.

We don't have a tradition of magick based on lineage, so much as based on shared viewpoints, considerations, and quite often, desires. Chaos Magick arose out of the discordant babble of Punk Rock and Rave Music and a generation of young magicians way back in the late 1970s and on into 1980s and 1990s.

We claim only a few magical orders to our name, but an ever growing populace of followers. From our terrible fold was unleashed such magicians as: Andrew Chumbley, a former member of the IOT who went on to work with the Clan of Tubal-Cain and found the Cultus Sabbati. Peter J. Carrol, who founded the Chaos Magick order known as the Illuminates of Thanateros. William S. Burroughs, who was (as far as I know) an IOT member and is arguably one of the greatest American writers to ever walk the planet. Phil Hine, who was the head of the IOT in the years following Carroll's departure for other fields and wrote two of the most beloved books on magick that we've ever produced. Fr. U.D., meanwhile, is a member of the German Thelema-offshoot known as the Fraternitas Saturnai and has produced equally excellent material for the aspiring magician. My favorite author from the American sphere of Chaos Magick is certainly Stephen Mace, whose love of Austin Spare may very well surpass my own. Fenwick Rysen, who recently released the Z-cluster archives and maintains the archival site Chaosmatrix.org also deserves some special mention, particularly as someone who has written on something I'm about to bring up.

Chaos Magick found its primary contributions of the current slew of magical practices by offering the possibility of technique to anyone, as well as the respective commentaries – for good or ill – of the past and present. Amongst these commentaries was the general recognition that previous generations of magicians built the systems that they used out of multiple outlooks and that these systems could at times be as much of a cause for concern as ignoring them altogether.

I will provide three examples for the sake of clarity, all pre-dating the rise of Chaos Magick itself.

- Paschal Beverly Randolph's system of magick. Paschal combined Hermetic techniques with those of Mesmerism, included ideas that were being promoted by Spiritualists in his day (and he spent quite some time considering himself one of them until he split with them and wrote The Unveiling: My Thoughts on Spiritualism). He also pulled from elements of folk magick and traditional Grimoire magick, resulting in a unique synthesis of magick specific to the 19th century. Included in his system are details for manipulating and utilizing the scrying mirror a piece of technology which is still debated hotly by some Grimoire magicians despite the fact that we know for certain it was used by nigromancers and necromancers in 14th, 15th, and 16th century Europe. What many of these individuals fail to realize is that Paschal also demonstrates a body of techniques to use along with the mirror that enable it to be more safely than many imagine. Central to its use is his Volantia, which is used to strengthen the will of the magician to prepare for mirror scrying, and Descretism, which is a means of giving orders that must be obeyed. Descretism owes much to the Mesmerism techniques of Joseph Francois Deleuze (1735-1835), and utilizing a voice in which Will and Authority are issued from it seem to have been common for Mesmerists.

- The Golden Dawn system of magick. The Golden Dawn system is a bit harder for me to talk about, as it employs elements I routinely ignore. Nonetheless the system itself utilizes the Enochian language of John Dee, elements of Qabalah as they filtered in through Renaissance magical practices, and other elements that evolved from specific texts central to the GD, like the Cipher Text and its inclusion of the elemental Pentacles used by a great many magicians today. QBL purists tend to dislike mistakes made by the GD practitioners in their system, even though QBL is mostly treated as a map in the system rather than treating the Tree of Life as the literal embodiment of spirit in the universe. In many cases, it is possible that errors are corrected by the Enochian currents in the GD system... But that is a debate for those well versed in the GD system, Enochian, and QBL – not one such as I, who treats QBL as an alien monstrocity that threatens to overwhelm previous outlooks on magick by subsuming them into a weird-ass construct that makes no sense.

- The Theosophical society and its... I don't even want to call the misguided outlook of the Theosophical society a “system,” but I know people who use their materials and seem to get something out of it. Anyway, the Theosophical system was built out of synthesizing Christian, Spiritualist, and Hindu practices and beliefs with a hefty dose of what can best be described as 'weird shit'. Theosophists seem to have popularized the concept of magical energy – a bastardized way of looking at magical power and the popular imagination regarding electricity, not to mention eastern ideas like Chi/Qi and Prana – which survives and is utilized to this day.

All of these systems recompiled older ideas and materials from previous magical generations, and in some cases created problems by trying to synthesize outlooks on magick that don't necessarily work together very well. In other cases, there are no problems, until we begin utilizing specific materials together that may well contradict one another.

Recognizing some of these issues, Chaos Magicians turn to what we tend to call “The Models of Magick,” a set of general models which fuel the various systems of magick. Ever since Fr. UD penned the piece, Chaotes have been obnoxiously attempting to create their own models or bickering over which works best. That doesn't really matter, though.

The reality of the situation is that most practitioners today utilize multiple models at once. It is rare to see someone who doesn't combine the spirit and energy models, for example, to fuel what they do. They “build up energy” to provide for calling up spirits, or making them, and possibly even “feeding” them with it. As long as it works, no one questions it. But once someone encounters a problem, they tend to default into looking into their system or even their outlook for where problems arose from.

I bring this up thanks to a set of recent pieces by Sannion wherein he chronicles the deeply upset outlook of various Reconstructionists (see here, here, and here) and other practitioners, and they rant about people who call up fictional characters and act like it is the same as their deeply serious religious outlook on matters.

From a Chaos Magician's standpoint, the most important fact of all magical endeavors is that they should be an adventure. Thus quaint questions about what you're about to call into the mirror matter less than the act of calling the thing up in the mirror. In fact, seeing if something that you know is blatant fiction will appear is seen as quite interesting, as it raises the question of what we are interacting with at different times. I say this as someone who once spent four hours discussing the practice of magically manipulating others with Nyarlathotep. Insofar as I'm concerned, the conversation with a blatantly fictional Lovecraftian character was far more inspiring at the time than a number of other attempts I made to contact different divinities. It certainly was as much fun as seeing Dionysos.

Instead of furthering the debate by directly addressing the silly critisms of those who are afraid they won't be taken seriously, I'm going to explain how to scry up something you know is not real, and is completely fictional. You can use the same techniques to call up something you're pretty sure isn't fictional later, and devastate whatever stupid little qualms are running through your head if you feel it is necessary. [EDIT: The previous is wrong. That was my ego talking. For the love of God, don't do that. This suffices for thoughtform work, but you want way more protections and sway on your side for a standard evocation.] Why? Chaotes just call fictional characters that can be summoned 'thoughtforms', and consider learning how to scry more successfully a more legitimate goal than ranting about metaphysical validity. If that bothers you? You can drink a nice, tall glass of “shut the fuck up.” Because, really, we care deeply about your concerns.

For this operation you will need:
1. A mirror that has bad the reflective surface removed and glossy black paint. Should that prove to be too much trouble, finding a suitable picture frame with glass and backpainting the glass glossly black should work. I prefer circular and oval mirrors, but you may feel differently. It really doesn't matter.
2. A premade sigil from the character's name. If you plan to call up Batman, for example, you can sigilize “Bruce Wayne” and then also use his bat logo as another sigil. Hell, you can also make one for 'Batman' and have a set of three to work with. If you don't know how to make a sigil, see any book on Chaos Magick ever written, as or at least half the other essays on the subject ever written.
3. A candle, or three candles. (Unless you're doing it during daylight hours and don't need the light to illuminate your reflection.)
4. A bar of soap, or an ink pen which can be washed off when you're done. With the black surface, something white or gray will probably appear more legibly than otherwise.
5. A watch, unless you don't need it. (See below.)
6. Incense, preferably Frankincense and Myrrh or Three Kings Incense.

Now select an appropriate space to work in. You won't want to be disturbed while you trip balls and talk to a man or woman in a black mirror. If you want, you can also cart the thing to a crossroad and make use of that place's inherently liminal aspects to bolster the work. But it's just as easy to do at home. (The mirror, after all, doesn't have to be particularly large.)

With most thoughtforms, you won't need to set down a circle because they don't have a huge amount of power to toss your way.
However if you feel the need to put one down, and place the mirror within a triangle, feel free to do so. Extra layers of protection never hurt anyone as far as I know.

For choices of when to work, that depends on the character. If you plan to chat up Batman, he is a blatantly lunar character (“I am the night!”) and the lunar hours of the day can be used to bolster what you're doing. Superman, on the other hand, is quite solar and would well with the Hours of the Sun. Spock, of Star Trek fame (and discussed being called up by Andrieh Vitimus in his book on Chaos Magick) works well during Mercury hours.

Now, set up your mirror and cleanse the space. This can be easily done by tracing a circle around the area of working while fumigating it with the F+M incense. You can also banish if you feel it necessary. Remember that an LBRP won't suffice to clean out the space, but the F+M can fill in for a Banishing Ritual of the Hexagram. Or you can do the traditional LBRP + BRH. Whatever works, right?

Now place your sigil at the top or the bottom of the mirror. If you have multiple sigils, lay them out across the different points of the mirror, but be sure not to obscure the part where you will see your own reflection within. These sigils designate the desired spirit, along with our conjuration, and specify what we want to call within the mirror.

Now we light the candle, placing it before the mirror as a source of illumination, put ourselves in a hypnotic state of trance. This can be most easily done by staring at a fixed location
without blinking for around three and a half and four minutes. This is easier said than done if you have never practiced doing so before, and the complete noobie is recommended to take time and 'build up' to it. Paschal's practice of Volantia is immediately useful in the weeks preceeding scrying up anything. If you need something to stare at, just use the face of your watch. You should generally be aware of when the altered state of consciousness begins to kick in, as colors will begin seeming more vivid, your somatic sensations may increase, etc. For the purposes of this dialogue, it is worth noting that the smell of many traditional incenses also help create altered states of consciousness, and thus the incense serves a further role of facilitating entering one.

Now we conjure our thoughtform. For the purpose of this dialogue, I'm stealing an all purpose conjuration from David Rankine's
The Book of Treasure Spirits. In particularly, it descends from the Sloane manuscripts and is a general “invocation” (the author is not using the term in the way modern magicians tend to, but rather in its more archaic and literal use). It is rather long, and so I have shortened what we're using. For the full conjuration see The Book of Treasure Spirits, P. 48-54.
“O you Spirit, or Spiritual power, who is known to us from the Tradition of our Ancestors, & called by the Name of N: of what nature Order, Office, angle, Mansion or other place of abode wheresoever you are, or may be of, or do reside, frequent or in any wise properly or differently appertain or belong unto, or whether Elemental or Infernal, or other wandering Spirit or Power, either of Light or darkness, having the power given you to visit the Earth, & to execute the Commandments of the highest: and also by divine provision plainly & visibly, & in a fair & decent form to appear unto the Sons of Men, Servants of the most high God living on earth, whensoever you shall be of them Invocated, Commanded, called forth, moved, & thereby Conjured, & constrained thereunto, to obey them, to serve them, & to be friendly unto them, & readily forthwith to fulfill & performed all such their commands * requests which they shall make; wherein by nature Office order, place or power, you may in any wise by concerned or serviceable.

Know therefore O ye Spirit called by the name N: (as aforesaid) that we the Servants of the most high God, & reverently here present in his holy fear, do Conjure, Command, Constrain, move & call you forth to visible Appearance [Within This Mirror*], in the name of the most high Madzilodarp and by virtue and power of his glorious, great, mighty & sacred names, Tetragrammaton, Jehovah, Adonay, Zeboath, Jah, Saday, AGLA, EL, Elohim, Alpha & Omega, and who said, let us make Man, according to our Imagine & Similitude, & let him bear rule over the works of our hands, & have sovereign power & command over all Sublunar spirits, both Aerial, Terrestrial & otherwise Elemental, & all other wandering Spirits & Infernal Spirits, of all Orders & offices whatsoever, both of Light & Darkness, & by your Seal & Character, most firmly & solidly binding, subjecting & obliging you by Order and Office, both to the divine Command of the Highest, & his servants the sons of men, calling forth & moving you thereunto.

And we do also further Conjure, Compel, Command, Constrain, Call forth & move you, by nature, degree, Order & Office, unto what Hierarchy Mansion or Place of Residence whatsoever you appertain or belong unto, or wheresoever else you shall at this present be either wandering out of Orders,, or otherwise, O you spirit, who is called N: to visible appearance [within the mirror], Move therefore O you spirit N:...”

Obviously, this wasn't made for thoughtforms, but any general spirit encountered and conjured. However, they are just as compelled with such a work into the mirror. During the course of the conjuration, you should begin seeing your
face distort until it becomes the face of the spirit. This includes thoughtforms. Prior to that, it has been my experience that a range of colors and shapes begin shifting through the murk of the mirror, and the appearance of the spirit finalizes this process. The conjuration continues beyond what I've sampled, and is excellent for any number of “actual,” non-thoughtform spirits that aren't offended by the seriousness of the call, or the powers called on. Some spirits encountered seem to have minor changes to such compulsions, but these changes are best made by those used to it.

Generally, these operations will teach you to conjure spirits into the mirror. They might very well not teach you how to compell them, and Paschal's techniques fill in many gaps, however. Beginning with a thoughtform is actually advisable over other spirits, possibly with their own levels of authority, because thoughtforms can be far less dangerous when offended than spirits bearing any semblance of power on their own.

That said? It's an adventure. When you're done, give a standard license to depart:
“I hereby consent that
N: leave, to fulfill my requests, and give license to depart to any and all other spirits drawn to this working, etc. Hekas Hekas, etc.” And then close up shop, reversing your fumigated circle or doing another LBRP+BRH, etc.

“Playing” with such things as the magic mirror may not make you enlightened... But it may just give you the practice you need to confidently call up other spirits... Something a great many of the differing super-serious factions completely lack.

Be seeing you,
Jack.




*I added the specification of within the mirror, obviously.


[EDIT]:  See this entry for a warning I was very foolish to have left out regarding standard conjurations and the mirror.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

“My Name is a Heart Encircled By a Serpent.” (P. 2)




Mobility & Magick
It was forever ago that I put down what's in the first part of this commentary. But I wanted to finish out what I started forever ago, and some of the things I wanted to be done for the second commentary have already been shoved into the depths of the blog...

This was further encouraged by some of my recent entries, regarding elementals, and the responses of Fr. Acher and others. My general amusement was about his contrast between working outside, in the world, versus within “the Temple,” or the personal sphere of practice favored by a great many magicians. I'm a poor bastard, and when I was younger I couldn't afford a personal temple... I also lived in a house with a Southern Baptist mother, and she preferred I do nothing at home. Thus, aside from the occasional LBRP, I never did anything at home if it could be avoided.

Thus traveling – particularly on foot – to perform my different rituals has always been one of my primary means of accomplishing various magical pursuits. It also ended up changing my approach to ritual, because when you're utilizing mobility and practicing magick in the middle of the night you want to avoid the attention of police officers, not to mention the occasional  3 AM drunk. As such, I don't dress up in robes. I have never taken my sword with me, and I've certainly never dropped it on my foot while trespassing in a graveyard. Obviously, few do. But someone occasionally reads about this subject and decides they should run around looking like a Hogwarts reject and then gives us all a bad name by mutilating themselves. For such performances, lean and mean is the way to go. All you need is some incense, a piece of charcoal, a lighter (preferable wind-proof), a folding knife that you've enchanted to work with, and a backpack or an outfit that doesn't stand out much and has enough pockets to carry anything you need with you. A protective charm, such as one that protects your house but has retrofitted for personal use, or an all-purpose charm is also useful.

Finally, one can also always consider performing a spell for astral invisibility is also particularly useful. These spells tend to mask your aura, or at the very least make you less perceptible while you practice to both spirits – and as is sometimes the case – and people. Obviously, drawing attention to yourself defeats the purpose of such things. Lunar glamors can also be used to heighten such effects, with the obvious caveat that a strong solar charge will blast them apart and leaving you again quite noticeable.



Exploiting the Crossways

Once one has finished initial work and made their way out into the world – the initial work including locating either a trivium (three-way crossroads) or a quadrivium (four-way crossroads) – one need only travel to that. Upon reaching the crossroads we can set ourselves up two different ways which reach the same goals:

- We can eschew physical protections, leaving fewer traces that we were ever there, and simply perform a means of cleansing space closer to what we see in the PGM. To quote Tony Mierzwicki's Graeco-Egyptian Magic:
There is no evidence of the Graeco-Egyptian magickians working within a circle. They confronted spiritual energies directly, much as many shamans still do. The Graeco-Egyptian magickians were only interested in facing each of the four cardinal directions and not tracing a 360* circle… Each ritual begins with a short invocation to Aion, the ultimate god, whose protection is sought. With his protection, no harm will befall the ritual participant.”
In this case we want to use either Mr. Mierzwicki's version of the Calling of the Sevenths (beginning on page 17) and introductory rituals found in his excellent book, or if you prefer, the same rituals as Michael Cecchetelli has them in The Book of Abraxas (p. 15 – 23). This first part merely brings 'equilibrium' to forces of the planets upon the practitioner and helps secure a location for work.
- We can add a layer of physical protection, particularly if we find that a lot of the restless dead are slumming the crossroad (as they do, and seem to gather in greater number in deep winter and summer, at least in my experience) and we're afraid that they might become a problem. The best solution for this is a circle of salt, as salt is both a purificatory element and will keep the dead out. This obviously isn't a very good idea if you plan to attempt to work with them, as it can harm them. It does not appear to harm the Cthonic Divinities, who are themselves pure, and thus doesn't typically hinder the ability to work with them. At least in my experience.

A number of years ago, I asked another, more experienced witch: “why is salt protective, and how is it supposed to work?”

His response was that prior to the discovery of microbes, it was assumed that physical decay (particularly in meats) was caused by “demons” or malign spirits, and since salt preserves meat, it was seen as keeping them at bay. While the above certainly isn't scientifically valid, the tactic still works to hold spirits at bay – which is, I suspect, the primary reason some of us use it today. You can either use granulated salt, or salt rock. The key is distinguishing between which to take with you; gravel roads aren't all that great for tracing salt along, but paved roads are perfect for it. Obviously, you could even take some blessed chalk and use one of the magical circles from the Grimoires – but good luck making the damn thing in the dark. I find that a circle of salt may not be elegant, but it is simple and works. In my experience, sometimes pragmatism simply trumps elegance.

Next we want to bless the incense and fumigate our secured zone, which is also a means of protection. I rather like the first hymn in the Orphic Hymns for this, and as a bonus you get to call on Hekate. You can either perform the full hymn (#0, To Musaeus) or limit to what I've selected:
And to my holy sacrifice invite, the pow'r who reigns in deepest hell and night;
I call Einodian Hecate, lovely dame, of earthly, wat'ry, and celestial frame,
Sepulchral, in a saffron veil array'd, leas'd with dark ghosts that wander thro' the shade;
Persian, unconquerable huntress hail! The world's key-bearer never doom'd to fail
On the rough rock to wander thee delights, leader and nurse be present to our rites
Propitious grant our just desires success, accept our homage, and the incense bless.”

This is where we either put our folding knife, or a pair of tongs (helpful on a windy day – but sometimes just as obnoxious!), to a use that isn't your standard protection fare. Place the incense for your given working (frankincense, or Three Kings Incense which includes it, work great for general purpose rituals) on a single charcoal and fumigate the area while walking widdershins three times and reciting the above. Afterwards, it can be set aside on a rock or the ground and left burning and tended to as needed.

For protection, we can call on Aion – the Alexanrian God of Eternity – or Ogdoas as Mr. Mierzwicki suggests, or we can make use of the traditional divinities. When using the trivium, Hekate works best. When using the Quadrivium, Hermes Kthonios works best. Lacking a hymn to Hekate herself, I'll be stealing a section from a PGM spell. If you have something you perfer? Feel free to use it.

Hymn to Hermes Kthonios, Or the Terrestrial Hermes (Fumigation from Storax):
“Hermes I call, whom Fate decrees to dwell in the dire path which leads to deepest hell
O Bacchic [Bakkheios] Hermes, progeny divine of Dionysius [Dionysos], parent of the vine,
And of celestial Venus [Aphrodite] Paphian queen, dark eye-lash'd Goddess of a lovely mien:
Who constant wand'rest thro' the sacred feats
where hell's dread empress, Proserpine [Persephone], retreats;
To wretched souls the leader of thc way when Fate decrees, to regions void of day:
Thine is the wand which causes sleep to fly, or lulls to slumb'rous rest the weary eye;
For Proserpine [Persephone's] thro' Tart'rus dark and wide gave thee forever flowing souls to guide.
Come, blessed pow'r the sacrifice attend, and grant our mystic works a happy end.”

As noted above, the following comes from PGM IV. 2785 – 2890. (Betz, P. 90 – 92) I have taken out a few lines and shortened it, so consult the spell for more details. Furthermore, the spell is calling upon a lunar Daimon that is heavily syncretized to multiple lunar goddesses. Thus, there is a fair bit of mish-mash when it comes who is being called upon. Feel free to edit it, if you feel up to it, so that it focuses solely on Hekate. Given that Hekate ended up often being syncretized with other lunar and Cthonic goddesses, the multiplicity of the spell doesn't bother me and I quite like it. Obviously, we're changing the reason for our praises and going to ask for protection versus an amulet to acquire any spell at the end, and thus no need for procuring the blood of one who has died a violent death.*

Come to me, O Beloved Mistress, Three-faced
Selene, kindly hear my sacred chants;
Night's ornament, young, bringing light to mortals...
Three-headed, you're Persephone, Megaira,
Allekto, many-formed, murky lamps, who shake your locks
Of fearful serpents on your brow, who sound
The roar of bulls out from your mouths, whose womb
Is decked with the scales of creeping things,
With poisonous rows of serpents down the back,
Bound down your backs with horrifying chains
Night crier, bull-faced, loving solitude,
Bull-headed, you have eyes of bulls, the voice
Of Dogs; you hide your forms in the shanks of lions,
Your ankle is wolf-shaped, fierce dogs are dear
To you, wherefore they call you Hekate,
Many-named Mene, cleaving air just like
Dart-shooter Artemis, Persephone,
Shooter of deer, night shining, triple-sounding,
Triple-headed, triple-voiced Selene.
Triple-pointed, triple-faced, triple-necked,
And goddess of the triple ways, who hold
Untiring flaming fire in triple baskets,
And you who oft frequent the triple way
And rule the triple decades, unto me,
Who'm calling you be gracious and with kindness
Give heed, you who protect the spacious world
At night, before whom daimons quake in fear
and gods immortal temple, goddess who
Exalt men, you of many names...!
Hail, goddess, and attend your epithets,
I burn for you this spice, O child of Zeus,
Dart-shooer, heavenly one, goddess of harbors,
Who roam the mountains, goddess of crossroads,
O nether and nocturnal, and infernal,
Goddess of dark, quiet and frightful one,
O you who have your meal amidst the graves,
Night, Darkness, broad Chaos: Necessity
Hard to escape are you; you're Moira and
Erinyes, torment, Justice, and Destroyer,
And you keep Kerberos in chains, with scales
Of serpents are you dark, O you with hair
Of serpents, serpent-girded, who drink blood.
Who bring death and destruction, and who feast
On hearts, flesh eater, who devour those dead
Untimely, and you who make grief resound
And spread madness, come to my sacrifices,
And lend me protection and guidance!”**
The spell states that for work in which one wishes good, to use storax, frankincense, and other such purification related elements. I totally recommend it. You're on your own for turning around and fucking someone's world up, though. Worry not! Jason Miller's Protection and Reversal Magic has you covered for counter-hexes and such using Hekate and such things could be applied following the above quite easily.



Down to Business
At this point, what you do is up to you. When I began writing these two pieces, I imagined it would help with performing the Stele of Jeu. I imagined that something like the above would allow for a fully fleshed out night of ritual, culminating in meeting a proper Daimon. As such, I suggest it. And I suggest the Stele of Jeu being performed before you do any crazy work, or in the event that you run into trouble. It has been my experience that the Headless God (or Headless Daimon) can sort problems very, very rapidly. That said, with the above you can probably follow it up with whatever you want – including dedicating a supper to Hekate herself.

Incidentally, you can also simply call on either deity at the crossroads and then proceed to a vineyard for the Stele's Performance, simply setting up space there instead (you can always call on the divinities again, but they'll respond from the crossroad, period). It has been my experience that the Stele, when performed in a vineyard, will strengthen the syncretic elements of the Agathos-Daimon and lead to a slightly different, far more serpentine and potent, manifestation of the Headless God. This is because one is increasing sympathy with the Agathos-Daimon by entreating a deity it's syncretized to, and then being possessed by that Daimon, while in a location that is sympathetic to the A.D. itself. The manifestation and communion was so potent for me that for a long time I insisted that the Headless God was just the Agathos-Daimon.

I was wrong. But I've at least come to understand how I made that mistake.

Anyway, I hope this rambling entry is of use to someone who wants to take their rituals out on the town.

To close, make sure to re-walk your circular area deosil if you began with a widdershins movement, and remember to give your license to depart. ;)

Be seeing you,
Jack.

* I'm working on circumventing that altogether for the spell itself, but have no results yet. Maybe I'll write another entry about that at a later date!
** That last line is 100% from me. Instead, the spell asks for one's wish.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

1628: Revels in New Canaan [EDITED]


“The Inhabitants of Pasonagessit (having translated the name of their habitation from that ancient Salvage name to Ma-reMount [MerryMount]; and being resolved to have the new name confirmed for a memorial to after ages) did devise amongst themselves to have it performed in a solemne manner with Revels, & merriment after the old English custorne: prepared to sett up a Maypole upon the festivall day of Philip and Jacob ; & therefore brewed a barrell of excellent beer, & provided a case of bottles to be spent, with other good cheer, for all comers of that day. And because they would have it in a complete forme, they had prepared a song fitting to the time and present occasion. And upon Mayday they brought the Maypole to the place appointed, with drums, guns, pistols, and other fitting instruments, for that purpose ; and there erected it with the help of Salvages, that came thether of purpose to see the manner of our Revels. A goodly pine tree of 80 foot long, was reared up, with a pair of buckshorns nailed one, somewhat neare unto the top of it : where it stood as a faire sea marke for directions; how to finde out the way to mine Hoste of Ma-reMount.

And because it should more fully appeare to what end it was placed there, they had a poem in readiness made, which was fixed to the Maypole, to shew the new name confirmed upon that plantation; which although it were made according to the occurrents of the time, it being Enigmatically composed) puzzled the Seperatists most pitifully to expound it. . .

The setting up of this Maypole was a lamentable spectacle to the precise seperatists : that lived at new Plymouth. They termed it an Idoll; yea they called it the Calf of Horeb: and stood at defiance with the place, naming it Mount Dagon; threatening to make it a woefull mount and not a merry mount. . . .
There was likewise a merry song made, which (to make their Revells more fashionable) was sung with a chorus, every man bearing his part; which they performed in a dance, hand in hand about the Maypole, whiles one of the Company sung, and filled out the good liquor like gammedes and Jupiter.

The Songe:
Drinke and be merry, merry, merry boyes,
Let all your delight be in Hymens joyes,
IĆ“ to Hymen now the day is come,
About the merry Maypole take a Roome.
Make greene garlands, bring bottles out;
And fill sweet Nectar, freely about,
Uncover thy head, and feare no harm,
For hers good liquor to keepe it warme.
Then drinke and be merry, &c.
IĆ“ to Hymen, &c.
Nectar is a thing assign'd,
By the Deities owne minde,
To cure the hart opprest with grief,
And of good liquors is the chief,
Then drinke, &c.
IĆ“ to Hymen, &c.
Give to the Mellancolly man,
A cup or two of't now and than;
This physick' will soone revive his bloud,
And make him be of a merrier mood.
Then drinke, &c.
IĆ“ to Hymen, &c.
Give to the Nymphe thats free from scorne,
No Irish; stuff nor Scotch over worn,
Lasses in beaver coats come away,
Ye shall be welcome to us night and day.
Then drinke, &c.
IĆ“ to Hymen, &c.

This harmless mirth made by young men (that lived in hope to have wives brought over to them, that would save them a labour to make a voyage to fetch any over) was much distasted, of the precise Seperatists: that keep much ado, about the tithe of Muit [mint] and Cunmin ; troubling their braines more then reason would require about things that are indifferent: and from that time sought occasion against my honest Host of Ma-reMount to overthrow his undertakings, and to destroy his plantation quite and cleane . . .”
- Thomas Morton

[EDIT]: The link above has a few details about Morton's life, but a few things stand out. Morton discovered, following his trip to America with Wollaston, that Wollaston had been selling indentured servants into slavery on Virginia tobacco plantations. In 1626 CE, Morton aided the remaining servants in the community with arms (pistols and guns), and they drove out Wollaston. They then renamed the settlement to Ma-remount (Merrymount), and began a thriving trade business with the local native Americans... Who they also appear to have helped procure arms. The incident at Mayday was the climax of Morton's antics, and when he encouraged the unmarried men in the settlement to consider marrying Native Americans, the surrounding colonies armed themselves (particularly Plymouth) and decided to get rid of Morton and his settlement of “all the scum of the country”. Morton was imprisoned Isles of Shoals, where he would have starved had the Native Americans - amused by his antics - not fed him until a ship arrived to return him to England, and briefly, the Essex jail.

He returned twice thereafter, and was arrested twice more. Today we would probably regard Morton's goals as 'Christo-Pagan' - as he seemed to have desired to see a community in which 'thinly disguised heathenry,' trade/commerce with the local Native Americans, and an entirely new form of culture to have emerged from the newly landed Americans. Unfortunately, his antics as a 'Irresponsible White Man' made this largely impossible. Still, of all the early American settlers - Morton is my favorite.

Tonight I shall sing his song to Hymen joyously! While, of course, drinking and giving the good stuff to the spirits that are whispering to the windy Sacramento parks already!
“They ... set up a May-pole, drinking and dancing about it many days together, inviting the Indian women, for their consorts, dancing and frisking together (like so many fairies, or furies rather) and worse practices. As if they had anew revived & celebrated the feasts of ye Roman Goddess Flora, or ye beastly practices of ye mad Bacchanalians.”
- William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation.
Thomas Morton's page on wikipedia.